Ivory soap, "its 99% pure.....!"
The advertiser here clearly thinks that it is appealing to have something that is pure.....never mind what that thing is.
Would it matter if it is 99% pure poison? we don't seem to want to know. Just thinking that it is close to perfectly pure is good enough.
When going for ethnic food, a very common question is "is it authentic?" Kind of a similar move as preferring purity.
Children of mixed blood have long suffered the scorn of society until recent times. The change in attitude is remarkable in that mixed blood children are now cherished as having the best of both worlds.
What are the possible reason for preference for purity and authenticity?
1. Precious material. Something like gold which is valuable and expensive in its own right would be cheapened if mixed with some other cheaper metal. Therefore, in valuable commodities, purity indicates no degrading from the valuable material. (But soap is cheap!)
2. Tribalism. When there is pride of association with a social group, there is a natural preference for a "true blue" example of that group as value is defined by the group.
3. Deferral to expert. If a trusted source said that Chinese food is good, then we want to find a place serving "authentic Chinese food" just so that we can experience what our expert recommended.
4. Easy classification. We make sense of the world by categorizing everything into stereotypes. These stereotypes reside in neat, well defined boxes in our minds and we do not want to complicate our understanding with blurry edges, in between situations.
5. There must be other reasons. Let us know what you think!
So, should we prefer purity? Let's look at some counter examples:
Pure gold is soft and yellow. The 14K and 10K gold is much stronger, better suited to making intricate jewellery, prettier color according to most preferences.
Metallurgist have long discovered that alloys of different metals makes for better strength and other physical characteristics. Purity is definitely not valued here.
Fusion foods is all the rage. Combining ancient practices with new food groups is continuing to expand our taste buds. After all, if it taste good, does it matter what category we put it in? Is variety not preferable to narrow selection?
While tradition can be a distillation of experience from those before us, we can also benefit from explorations outside of tradition. A good tradition will stand up to these tests while changing circumstances will demand shifts in tradition to suit the times. The pursuit of purity in tradition makes it rigid and gradually falls out of favor for being irrelevant with the times.
The conclusion? Purity, but for what purpose?
Not all purity is worth going for, even if some may be.
I think its entirely an individualistic matter whether one is following a tradition, or not. Its when a tradition is impossed or seen as righteous that humanity seems to break down, gradually disisociating with the purity of the tradition. But as I said some people wouldn't change their traditional ways under any circumstances. Its unfortunate when children or some adults are forced to conform. Conformity always breaks the human spirit of creativity and leads no where, except as a way to weed out those who are in line with the tradition and those who are not.
ReplyDeleteMy idea of tradition is having hot chocolate after skiing....
VTS
Funny how I always think of enduring brussels sprouts at Christmas dinner and the polite responses to it when talk of tradition comes up. Children must wonder what that is about.
DeleteThen someone suggested frying it wok style instead of boiling and maybe add some sesame seed oil for good measure. Have to try that some time. Will tradition be broken, violated, or improved?
Think also of the synonym virgin as in olive oil and of the promised maidens in paradise.
ReplyDeleteDan
Linguistic purity: based on belief that at one time in history this language has been 'pure'(?). This movement is often connected with political/religious/social/cultural, beliefs connected with superiority of a native culture. Linguistic purists wish to eliminate from their language certain 'innovative features' such as neologisms, foreign loanwords, syntactic innovations etc. (e.g., computer= french 'cordinateur').
ReplyDeleteI.
French for computer is 'ordinateur' typo;-)
DeleteI.